A Healthy Way of Life Company

This Question is Answered (go to answer)

2 "helpful" answers available (2 pts)
677 Views 34 Replies Last post: Nov 16, 2009 9:04 PM by derijia RSS
TOM HIRT Newbie 8 posts since
Jul 14, 2009
Currently Being Moderated

Oct 17, 2009 10:55 AM

On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

It's becoming frustrating lately to schedule a league match in the evening only to find the evening is booked with two 90 min slots. I would recommend that 90 min be done away with completely. At a min, I would like to see the evening zone (5:00 pm- 10:00 pm) restricted to hour play only, to help get as many matches in as possible.

 

It also seem counter productive to allow 30 min slots. I would much rather see 60 min as the only option. I suspect many only need 30 min, but book it for 60 min and lets keep the schedule sane and stop having these holes in the schedule that just don't help anyone.

 

I would also like to see at least the member number or last name to the person making the reservation. My wish list request would then be to provide a monitor in the court hallway that displays the current two hours reservation. This would really help in all the confusion that I see with people getting kicked off courts because they scheduled the court wrong. Most of which will be avoided going with a 60 min window only approach.

 

Any thoughts?

JIM BESTUL Newbie 1 posts since
Aug 8, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 23, 2009 4:33 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

I agree that no one is scheduling a 30 minute slot.  A hour time slot is a good way to go.

 

I agree with a Monitor of the first name or initials of who has the court would eliminate a whole lot of problems.

 

I'd also like to see online when it's the court is booked for a few hours by LT whether that is league or open play or why it's closed off for like 5 hours.  It would save me a phone call and the person behind the desk a minute of time.

CHARLIE MULGREW Newbie 2 posts since
Jul 10, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 25, 2009 4:07 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

I believe that during weeks that the league ties up the courts, courts should be restricted to 60 minutes of play time to allow maximun participation of all players and members. Holiday weeks or summer when leagues are not in session, 90 minute scheduling should be reinstated.

 

Additionally, the amount of time a member is able to schedule should be the same whether it is done on line or at the front deak.

CHARLIE MULGREW Newbie 2 posts since
Jul 10, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Nov 1, 2009 4:42 PM in response to: CHARLIE MULGREW
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

PLEASE STOP sending me emails!!!!!!!!!!!!

jcaire Newbie 19 posts since
Jul 1, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 25, 2009 7:05 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
I think that we should keep the 30 min and 60 min options available, even the 90 minute option is nice sometimes during the day when its really dead in the courts. I got off my shift at 1 pm everyday and have the court scheduled from 1 to 2:30 pm. I don't see anyone else coming in to play or reserving courts around that time. Now, when it's primetime (5:00 - 9:00) i hate the 90 min block. Its ridiculous to play 3 whole sets basically when other people are trying to get a match in as well. I think do away with the 90 min during prime time but keep in the daytime when its really slow. I think the schedule should be printed and placed on the court doors as well.
Ziad Khan Newbie 4 posts since
Oct 3, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 25, 2009 7:15 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
A visual calendar that lets 30, 60 or 90 minute slots so members can see the vacant slots and efficiently book time without wasting any slots will be solution to all these booking problems that these drop down menus are creating. A common courtesy and a sports(man)ship already helps cooperative scheduling and respect and regard for all the other players.. Best .. Z
Susan McClendon Newbie 3 posts since
Oct 12, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 25, 2009 9:48 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

Mymessage is a little bit off the subject although I'll comment that maybe 90 minute slots would be okay during the week between maybe 6:00 am to maybe 4:00 pm. My main problem is when I want to reserve a court and can't because there all reserved.  I come in to work out or go to a class and there's NOBODY on the courts!  I think there needs to be some sort of accountability on players showing up when they reserve those courts.  What I do now is everytime I go to the gym, I bring my racquet because 9 out of 10 times, I can get some practice.  Be nice though to have someone to play with.

 

susie

David Wolter Newbie 1 posts since
Jul 7, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 25, 2009 10:37 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
The 90 minute and non-top of the hour reservations are doing two things, leaving 30" gaps in the schedule and keeping more people off the court, making the courts unavailable an even greater amount of time, espesially at clubs with few courts. I suggest getting rid of the 90" & 30" slots and either allowing each 60" slot to begin at the top of the hour or the bottom, not both.  The thought of allowing "anything goes" from 5 AM to 4 PM is realistic since far fewer players utilize the courts during those hours.  I used to play RB in the late 70's & early 80's when it was difficult to get a court and the loose scheduling practices of today would not have made anyone happy then, while a few players would have kept many more players from enjoying the game.
jcaire Newbie 19 posts since
Jul 1, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 26, 2009 2:43 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

I think that free for all would not be a good idea. I get off my shift here at 1 pm every day. Some times my replacement is a few minutes late and I don't get out right at one. I am pretty positive the guidelines are if a player doesn't show up within 15 minutes of their start time  they forfeit the court. I hate when people will book the slot for when they get to the gym, then do their workout and THEN come to the court and try and kick off whoever may be in there utilizing the abandoned court slot. I think that another problem is running over your time. Don't you love when you are ready to go, all stretched out and you look in the door only to see the previous match still in play! Then when I knock and let them know my block is up they say they will leave when their match is up, so, 20 minutes later you get to play your set. I think the actual CLUB rules should be posted as well as the game rules. Im still not unopposed to the 30 minute block, sometimes in prime time you'll be lucky to be able to squeeze in a 30 min power match or use it to work your own shots. Half the time thats what I end up doing for most of my reservation anyways, just get a little practice in to keep you loose.

GARRETT LUNDE Newbie 1 posts since
Jul 10, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 26, 2009 3:23 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

This should be based on a per club basis...one size does not fit all.

 

I also agree that people making reservations should be held accountable for either showing or cancelling so that others can use the slots.

ALBERT SALAS Newbie 1 posts since
Jul 18, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 26, 2009 3:57 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
Keep...A-Open players training can barely get a good workout in the 1 hour slot.  It's a choice and you can only make 1 reservation a day, so what s the big deal?
William McElroy Newbie 2 posts since
Jul 6, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 27, 2009 11:12 AM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

I personally like the 90 min. time slot.  Since only one person has to book the court, you might get people booking it for two-hours, one hour by each player, if you only allow a 60 min. time slot.  Then again, I don't usually have problems when I go.

SKIP COGHILL Newbie 10 posts since
Jul 1, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 27, 2009 3:03 PM in response to: William McElroy
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

I'm for keeping the 90 minute court time.

 

Someone earlier said you can't cancel online but that is not true.  Right at the top of the scheduling page is an option to "cancel a reservation"

Leigh Whitaker Newbie 16 posts since
Jul 1, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 27, 2009 3:15 PM in response to: SKIP COGHILL
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

"Someone earlier said you can't cancel online but that is not true.  Right at the top of the scheduling page is an option to "cancel a reservation""

 

Oh man!  I never noticed that before.  I even asked the person I talked to on the phone one time if we could cancel online and she said there currently was no way to do that.  This was very recently too.  How long has that feature been available?  Thanks for the tip!

 

For me, I had to click on "my reservations" (which I have never done before) and then I could cancel it on the next page that showed all my reservations.

 

I like the 90 minute time slot as well.  I use it regularly in the mornings.  I think, like someone else mentioned, that if it was done away with there would be people reserving one hour each of two players playing.  I'd be okay with it being limited to 60 min time slots during the busy times though.

 

Leigh

Susan McClendon Newbie 3 posts since
Oct 12, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 27, 2009 3:22 PM in response to: SKIP COGHILL
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
I never noticed that before!  What a great tip!!  Thanks!
SCOTT TRAVIS Newbie 2 posts since
Jul 8, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 27, 2009 10:38 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
Since we play early AM we prefer the 90 min slots. Works out just fine, if 90 were removed we would each just book an hour instead of one of us booking a 90. The evenings seem more desirable to some and thus 90 limits the amount of turn over on the court.
JAY ATHERTON Newbie 1 posts since
Jul 1, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 28, 2009 6:07 AM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

While I agree that the 30 minute time period should be eliminated, I don't believe that the 90 minute booking is excessive.  I book courts for an entire group of members that play regularly.  We coordinate as a group to book the courts, follow the booking guidelines and actually use the courts for the planned time period.

 

Quite frankly, it's more frustrating to find LTF booking courts during peak hours for non-racquet sport activities.  I would like to see the courts used for their intended purpose, and not for other activities. 

ROGER GUTH Newbie 6 posts since
Jul 1, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 29, 2009 12:10 AM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
First come ,first served. Keep 90
KEVIN BENJAMIN Newbie 1 posts since
Sep 21, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 28, 2009 12:13 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

Keep,

Thanks

jcaire Newbie 19 posts since
Jul 1, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 29, 2009 6:22 AM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

I dont think anyone should be discriminated against for being new to the game, if someone is new to the game and wants to play 90 minutes and they play the whole 90 minutes I say kudos to them.I am definitley not an A player or at league level at all. Im maybe C class, I take time everyday to practice my shots and serves but I dont have great control on the placement or anything like that.

 

I think it would be worse having the same 2 people on a court for two 60 min blocks. Then a WHOLE 2 hours is taken by one pair...I would say that is unfair to other people rying to get a court.  Maybe it would be better if they had actual set league times when only the league could play on the courts, I know they do that at some places, much like with the volleyball leagues on the Bball court.

Leigh Whitaker Newbie 16 posts since
Jul 1, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 29, 2009 6:58 AM in response to: jcaire
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

I've been pondering whether I agree or disagree that league players should get special considerations.  I'm not sure.  At first I was like, "No way!  I pay membership dues just like they do", but then I was thinking that they DO pay an extra fee to be in the league right?  I don't know...  I guess I would deal with it if they were given an extra day ahead of time to schedule.

 

At the same time, as long as you know 4 days in advance what day and time you want to play, it shouldn't be too hard to get a court.  I've been checking the schedules at about 6 AM for the farthest day schedulable, and at that time it's usually pretty open for the evening slots.

 

The reverse side of 'no time to play leagues' is that it's just as hard for us beginners to schedule courts in the evening when leagues are going on.  There are a few people I play with who can only play on weekday evenings after work.  When I play in the morning it is easy to schedule a court, but when I play in the evening we have to really plan ahead and grab the courts ASAP, otherwise we know we won't be able to get one.

 

ETA:  I do usually only schedule an hour in the evening slots though, because I'm aware that it's a busy time.

 

Leigh

TED IRANI Newbie 1 posts since
Jul 11, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 29, 2009 1:41 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
I vote for keeping the 90 min slot.  I alway book 90 mins, and always play 3-4 sets using up at least 80 minutes.  Nothing worse than being in the middle of the tie breaking game and not getting to finish.
Danielle Maur Novice 67 posts since
Jul 5, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 31, 2009 11:38 AM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

Hello all Racquetball Players,

 

This is Danielle Maur the National Racquetball Director for Life Time. I have been following this thread for you comments and concerns on court times.

 

So you understand- I can request to change reservation times, but do to the software, it would be universal at all clubs and the times would be the same for the entire day. I am unable to "cherry pick".

 

So this program is about you.

 

I will post a poll on the national racquetball page for the time slots: Please vote in.

 

I recognize- most want the 30 min out, but the question comes in do we limit the games to 60 min and remove the 90? Or do we keep both?

 

In squash reservations we did change to only 60 min and it helped reduce "time gaps" and so far everyone is happy.

 

Please vote in.

 

Thank you,

Danielle Maur

National Racquetball Director

ROGER GUTH Newbie 6 posts since
Jul 1, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Nov 1, 2009 5:46 AM in response to: Danielle Maur
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
keep 90
Sue Schaffer Newbie 2 posts since
Aug 21, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 31, 2009 1:24 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
I'd like to keep the 90 minutes.  I'd like to see the big block in the afternoon opened up for sign ups.   It's hard to believe the courts are all filled and played on every day during that entire block out.
COTY ORNELAS Newbie 1 posts since
Jul 3, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 31, 2009 2:19 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
I would like to keep the 90 min. scheduling as well...
Amanda Youn Newbie 1 posts since
Jul 31, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Oct 31, 2009 2:27 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

I can't speak for others who play at different times or clubs (and that's whats going to make any standardized proposals difficult to please the majority) but I say leave it as is. Its worked fine and the 30, 60, 90 slots give the right amount of selection for player(s) to schedule.

kamikaze Newbie 2 posts since
Oct 25, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Nov 1, 2009 9:49 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?

I have been out of action since spring so not sure what enhancements have been made already but the 30-60-90 is a lesser concern than people reserving courts and not showing up. more than 50% of the time when I know that there is someone playing before me or after me, the courts are empty, although that time slot is not available online because someone has taken it and I suppose failed to cancel it.

 

It is more than a mere annoyance, from a club operations perspective you have a limited capacity to serve the membership i.e. number of courts available and number of hours available, especially in the peak or semipeak hours.

 

what I would suggest is that if people are not checking in and have courts reserved that some action is taken. I understand that things happen, work firedrills, family emergencies, traffic, etc, but the amount of time courts are booked by no-shows was rather strange atleast in spring.

Sue Schaffer Newbie 2 posts since
Aug 21, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Nov 3, 2009 12:09 PM in response to: kamikaze
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
I hate to change the subject, but could someone at South Austin just slap the correct court numbers on the racketball courts.  Doesn't even have to be painted on-  just clarify 1 and 2 PLEASE.
derijia Newbie 46 posts since
Jul 1, 2009
Currently Being Moderated
Nov 16, 2009 9:04 PM in response to: TOM HIRT
Re: On-line scheduling Enhancements- Keep or remove 90 min slot option?
I would have to say that I like the 30 minutes spots as a new player who doesn't have a partner. And the few people who offered to play me found I'm' not enough of a challege for them so we don't play again. So the 30 minutes spots work for me cause I can''t last an hour alone. If I had to resevre for the hour I would and the court would sit empty if I choose not to play the whole hour. But I'll go with whatever the group decides.

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)