A Healthy Way of Life Company
1 2 Previous Next

Nutrition for Fitness

16 Posts tagged with the diet tag

Caeser Salad a.jpgDr. Atkins may have brought a heightened awareness of the use of low-carbohydrate diets, but their use in weight-loss is hardly new. They have been used in clinical practice since the 1800s. However, if you ask the average person about whether they are safe or healthy, you'll receive quite a mix of responses. More than likely, most people will say they are unsafe, bad for your heart, increase cholesterol, lead to malnutrition and a so on.

A Research Review of Diets from A to Z

Vegetarian, Dr. Christopher Gardner and his team, developed a unique research study which compared the results of four different diets: Atkins, LEARN, Ornish and Zone Diets. The four diets covered the spectrum from low-fat to low-carb. It was a unique research study in that it actually used specific diets rather than only putting research subject on various nutrient intake plans. A total of 311 overweight and obese women took part in the study and were divided amount the four different diet groups. Each group received classroom education and support in their specified diet plan. They were instructed to follow the diet as explained in the book. During the study, carbohydrate, fat and protein intake was as follows:

 

At 2 Months
Atkins
ZoneLEARNOrnish
Carb (%)18%42%49%48%
Fat (%)55%35%30%21%
Protein28%24%20%17%
At 12 MonthsAtkinsZoneLEARNOrnish
Carb (%)35%45%47%52%
Fat (%)44%35%33%30%
Protein20%20%19%18%

 

Looking at the comparison of the diets from month two to month twelve, there are a few interesting points that stand out.

- Based on the books, there is a clear difference in fat and carbohydrate intake between the Atkins and the Ornish plans, with the Zone and LEARN diets being in the middle of the other two.

- For both the Atkins and Ornish diets, you can see the eventual movement away from the very low carb or very low fat diet. With today's variety of foods, it's more difficult to stay at the extreme of either diet plan.

- Even though the Atkins group did eventually increase their carbohydrate intake and lower their fat intake, it still did not come close to the standard way of eating, which was more like the LEARN group.

Study Findings

Even though it rarely makes news headlines, many research studies have shown that low-carb diets are as good and sometimes better, for weight loss than low-fat diets. The results of this study reiterate those findings. They were as follows:

 

- Women on the lowest carb diet had more weight loss and body fat percentage loss

- LDL cholesterol fell the most for the Ornish group and rose slightly with the Atkins group. Although the slight rise in LDL cholesterol was seen as a negative in the past, there is mounting evidence to show that a rise in LDL cholesterol from higher fat intake comes from large-particle LDL cholesterol, which does not have a negative effect on health.

- HDL cholesterol (healthy cholesterol) rose the most with the Atkins group an did not rise at all with the Ornish group

- Triglycerides fell the most with the Atkins group

- Blood pressure decreased the most with the Atkins group and the least with the low-fat group

- Fasting insulin decreased the most with the Atkins and LEARN groups and fasting glucose decreased the most with the Atkins group

Summary

There have not been many long-term studies done to compare low-carb and low-fat diets. This study resulted in several important teaching points. First, it showed that sticking to the extreme of a very low carbohydrate or a very low fat diet is very difficult unless someone cooks each meal for an individual. That said, the Atkins group, although their carbohydrate intake increased and their fat intake decreased over the twelve months, did consume significantly less carbohydrate and more fat than the other groups. The low-carb group had better weight and body fat loss, and improved heart health risk factors more than the other groups. An October research review of low-carb diets in Current Diabetes Reports concluded:

 

"Although science continues to advance in this field, current research suggests that low-carbohydrate diets can be a viable option for achieving weight loss and may have beneficial effects on glycemic control, triglyceride levels, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in some patients."

 

Although reduced-carbohydrate diets may not be necessary for everyone to lose weight, evidence suggests that they can be beneficial for many people. The Atkins group was not able to maintain the low-carbohydrate levels they started with, but they still took in far less than the other groups and had better results in the end.

 

For a full review of the study in an entertaining lecture by Dr. Gardner, click on the video below.

 

 

In health,

Tom Nikkola

 

References:

Gardner C, Kiazan A, Alhassan S, Kim S, Stafford R, Balise R, Kraemer H, King A. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN Diets for Change in Weight and Related Risk Factors Among Overweight Premenopausal Women. JAMA 2007;297(9):969-977

Wylie-Rosett J, Davis NJ. Low-carbohydrate diets: an update on current research. Curr Diab Rep. 2009 Oct(5)396-404

 

Thisarticleis not intended for the treatment or prevention of disease, noras a substitute for medical treatment, nor as an alternativetomedicaladvice. Use of recommendations in this and other articles isatthechoice and risk of the reader.

240 Views 0 Comments Permalink Tags: weight, loss, nutrition, zone, diet, learn, low-fat, atkins, ornish, low-carb

Just Tell Me What to Eat

Posted by Tom Nikkola Oct 25, 2009

couple eating a.jpgTake a walk through the diet book section at any bookstore and prepare to be amazed. There are countless books on what is considered the optimal diet for health and weight loss. It is no wonder we are confused on what to eat. Many books have an "acceptable" food list along with rigid rules to follow in order to get the results promised. Depending on the plan, the food lists vary on what is considered healthy. To make things even more confusing, we are now seeing healthy recommendations in the grocery store as well. As a side-note, the FDA has helped put a halt on the promotion of the most current labeling program, called Smart Choices, which was a food industry-driven labeling plan.


Today, I want to just quickly touch on some common "healthy eating" misconceptions. To keep the article reasonable in length, I've added a comment or two to explain why these "nutrition recommendations" may not be that nutritious after all. However, I encourage you to explore these misconceptions further. The comments section at the end of the article would be a great place to discuss each one of these further.

Eat egg whites, but not the yolk

With eggs being a nutrition staple since almost the beginning of time, it's odd that in the past 20-40 years, we suddenly need to stop eating the yolk. Egg yolks, especially from pastured chickens, are loaded with nutrients. Eggs are considered by many nutritious experts as nature's perfect food. They are also one of the best sources of protein available. Egg yolks are one of the best sources of choline. Choline is essential for brain function.

Drink and eat non-fat dairy

Milk straight from the cow has fat. In order to "de-fat" milk it has to be processed in a way that damages the health giving compounds found in milk. The best choice is non-pasteurized, non-homogenized full fat milk. If you are concerned about the calories drink a half-cup instead of a full cup. You will be more satisfied as the milk has healthy fats like CLA that keep you satiated. If you're not ready for full-fat, try the 2%.

If you can't get your fruit in, drink juice or eat dried fruit

Whole fruit is far more filling and less calorie-dense than fruit juices or dried fruit. Fruit juice is loaded with sugar, even if it's unsweetened. People have a tendency to drink more of it compared to whole fruit as well. Because the water is gone from dried fruit, people can easily eat far more dried fruit for a snack than they can whole fruit.

Salmon is a great source of healthy fats

Wild Alaskan salmon is certainly filled with heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids. However, farm-raised salmon, which is usually fed grain (can you believe that) does not have the same fatty acids because they are not fed their natural diet. Eat salmon often, just make sure it is Wild Alaskan.

Foods that say they are high in omega-3s are healthier

It's true, most people need more omega-3 fatty acids in their diet. However, foods with "added omega-3s" do not contain enough to enhance your health. Food manufacturers are adding omega-3's in the form of plants. Plant-based omega-3, such as flax, does not provide the same benefits as omega-3 fish oil. which is very high in the omega-3s DHA and EPA. Plant-based omega-3 is high in ALA, which must be converted by our bodies into DHA and EPA. We are not very good at converting it, so you're much better off getting the majority of your omega-3s through fish oil.

Avoid saturated fat

Saturated fat helps increase HDL (good) cholesterol and when it increases LDL cholesterol, it's thought to increase large-particle LDL. Large-particle LDL cholesterol is not thought to affect heart disease risk. Foods that contain saturated fat, such as eggs, coconut oil, and animal proteins raised on their natural diet can be part of a healthy nutrition program.

Nuts are a great source of protein

Nuts can certainly be part of a healthy diet. It's better to view them as a source of healthy fat as opposed to a protein source. They have about 8 grams of protein and 16 grams of fat in a serving. To get enough protein from nuts for a meal or snack requires a lot of total calories. Get your protein from other sources, and use nuts to increase your intake of healthy fats.

Soy protein is a perfect health food

With soy's low-fat and no-cholesterol content, it's easy to understand how soy is promoted as a health food. While soy has been eaten in Asian cultures for hundreds of years, it has been eaten in a different form than is usually sold in stores today. Edamame, tempeh and miso can be included as part of a healthy diet, but other forms of soy, like soy milk, contain anti-nutrients and phytoestrogens that have the potential to lead to health issues.


The book The 150 Healthiest Foods on Earth, written by Dr. Johnny Bowden, contains the Top 10 Health Foods of 15 different nutrition experts, including the author himself. Interestingly, none of the experts picked soy in their Top 10 list.

Summary

These are just a few of the many misconceptions common in the diet industry. Each time a new concept for healthy eating comes out, a new niche of products is found. The idea of low-fat led to hundreds of low-fat foods, many of which were not natural foods. The popularity of omega-3 fatty acids is seen in many foods now with "added omega-3s." If we strive to eat real food that has been raised or grown the way nature intended, they possess the healthy nutrients our bodies need to live a long and healthy life. As always, there is only so much that can be discussed in a single article. If articles like this lead you to additional questions, feel free to use the comments section below to continue the discussion.


In health,

Tom Nikkola

 

This article is not intended for the treatment or prevention of disease, nor as a substitute for medical treatment, nor as an alternative to medical advice. Use of recommendations in this and other articles is at the choice and risk of the reader.

809 Views 0 Comments Permalink Tags: weight, loss, food, nutrition, health, diet, natural, soy

kabobs a.jpg"Red meat is strongly linked to cancer" reads the headline in a recent medical journal. Many such headlines have been found in newspapers, magazines and other article sources. Does the consumption of red meat really cause cancer?


Since the 1960s, meat has been associated in some research studies with higher levels of various cancers. Interestingly, there have been many studies that have shown no association either. Does one of the most popular sources of dietary protein in many countries really cause cancer? The most likely answer to the question is "maybe, but it depends." If you remember from last week's article, the definition of red meat is not black and white when you review what the literature says about meat consumption. The spectrum of "meat" can range from a highly-processed hot dog to a cut of grass-fed beef steak. To date, there has not been a clinical trial done to compare a group of people who refrain from red meat and compare it with those that do eat it for an extended period of time. Because of the cost of such a study and the challenge in controlling all the necessary variables, it's unlikely such a study would take place. Instead, the studies that have been done are epidemiological studies. They generally look at a group of people with higher cancer rates and compare that group, or groups, with another group, or groups of people with lower rates of cancer. Then they look at individual variables, such as total meat consumption and attempt to draw conclusions. Another way to do the study is to look at meat consumption in various populations and then compare the occurrence of cancer. The results of these studies have been mixed. Many studies have been done that show no effect of meat consumption on cancer risk, but they do not usually make new headlines.
Study Difficulty
Researching meat's effect on disease risks, including cancer, is a difficult task. Since the studies are epidemiological studies, they rely on food frequency questionnaires, which are known to be limited in their accuracy. As an example, one could ask a group of Americans about how often they eat red meat and compare meat consumption with another group from a country like China where there may be lower rates of various cancers and ask. There are several disadvantages to this type of study. They leave many questions unanswered, such as: What kind of red meat was it? Was it processed? How was it processed? Was it grass-fed meat or commercial meat? Then, the even more significant questions come into play, like: What about overall calorie consumption? What processed carbohydrates might be a part of the diet in one group and not the other? What other lifestyle variables are possible? What was fruit and vegetable consumption like? Is it possible that the health associated with plant-based diets comes more from high intakes of fruit and vegetable intake rather than limited meat consumption?


Cancer is more common in more developed nations, which tend to eat more meat, but also tend to eat more processed foods, sugar, less fruits and vegetables, might drink more alcohol, endure more daily stress, etc. So, to look at various populations and compare one piece of the diet and attempt to link it to a disease is a bit of a stretch. If we were able to so easily tie such associations together, we might also say that bottled water causes cancer because more developed countries, where cancer is more prevalent, drink more bottled water than less developed nations. Obviously no one would want to make that claim because it doesn't make sense.

What about meat could lead to cancer?

If studies have not yet shown a direct cause of cancer, does that mean there is no concern about meat consumption? Not necessarily. Carcinogens created during high-temperature cooking of meats can be part of the equation that could lead to colon cancer. According to Sally Fallon, "colon cancer occurs when vegetable oils and hydrogenated fats, along with certain carcinogens, are acted on by certain enzymes in the cells lining the colon." With the higher prevalence of vegetable oils and hydrogenated oils in American diets, the addition of carcinogens from meat cooked at high temperatures could increase the risk of cancer. Of course, this includes three variables - vegetable oil, hydrogenated oils and carcinogens. It's possible that if vegetable oils were not part of the diet, the carcinogens might have no effect.

Excess consumption of preservatives is another possible cause of the higher relation of meat consumption and cancer. Although they have been suggested to be safe when consumed in moderation, if people eat a diet mostly composed of processed, preservative-filled meat, they could increase their risk of certain cancers. If preservatives were a concern for cancer risk, a simple solution would be to avoid processed meats containing preservatives. This is as simple as reading a label and choosing wisely.

 

Gary Taubes, in his book Good Calories, Bad Calories presents another possible explanation.  Because many of the cancers occur in "endocrine-dependant organs," a disruption in the body's normal hormonal balance could increase the risk of cancer. An imbalance of hormones could occur from a diet of highly refined carbohydrates, which affects the body's ability to regulate the hormone insulin. It's possible this could lead to other hormonal disruptions. Also, more studies are pointing to the fact that increased levels of body fat tend to also release additional hormones that could affect the normal balance of hormones in the body. As mentioned above, cancer occurs at higher rates in more developed nations where obesity is higher and more processed carbohydrates are consumed. Higher meat consumption happens to also occur in these populations. In this case though, meat would be guilty only by association. Along those same lines is the question about the hormones used in commercial meats. Although they are supposedly safe, they can be easily avoided. If there was even a small possibility that the hormones passed along in animal products, it is not worth it to take the chance. Choose hormone-free products.

 

Finally, the majority of today's commercial beef is fed a corn-based diet, which dramatically changes the nutrient profile of the meat. When cows are fed corn, they have a much higher concentration of omega-6 fatty acids. Omega-6 fatty acids have been shown to increase inflammation. Cows fed their natural diet of grass have much more omega-3, which is anti-inflammatory.

Summary

To ensure you get the best nutrition possible, while avoiding any cancer-related risks, there are some simple steps you can take to improve your diet:


- Avoid preservatives. If you're going to eat processed meats, be sure to purchase preservative-free meats. Even if they are okay to eat in the diet in moderation, they're not necessary, so go without them.

- Look for hormone-free meat and dairy products. Specifically, look for packaged meat that says "raised without the use of hormones or antibiotics." A label that claims "raised naturally" or "antibiotic free" does not always mean it was raised without any hormones or antibiotics.

- As much as possible, try to purchase meat products that were fed a natural diet during their life cycle. Grass-fed, free-range beef, pastured pork and chicken, etc. When animals are fed their natural diet, the nutrient profile of the meat is improved dramatically. If you are not sure where to shop for farm-raised, natural foods, check out Eat Well Guide. All you need to do is enter your zip code and you'll find farms, stores, farmers markets and restaurants in your area that offer these foods.

- Eat plenty of vegetables and fruit. See Add Some Color to Your Day for more details.

- Reduce stress and get plenty of exercise


As long as you make wise choices about the type of meat you eat and how it was raised, it can be an important part of a well-rounded nutrition program.


In health,

Tom Nikkola


See also: The Meat of the Matter - Looking at Red Meat

 

References:

Taubes, G. Good Calories, Bad Calories. 2007. Anchor Books, New York, New York.

Pollan, M. The Omnivore's Dilemma. 2006. Penguin Group, New York, New York.

Fallon S, Enig M. It's the Beef. Wise Traditions. The Weston A. Price Foundation Newsletter. Spring, 2000

Brody J. Paying a Price for Loving Meat. The New York Times. April 27, 2009

Eades M. Meat and mortality. The Blog of Michael R Eades, M.D. March 24, 2009

Hansen W. Is red meat's bad name justified? Los Angeles Times. November 10, 2008

 

This article is not intended for the treatment or prevention of disease, nor as a substitute for medical treatment, nor as an alternative to medical advice. Use of recommendations in this and other articles is at the choice and risk of the reader.

320 Views 0 Comments Permalink Tags: nutrition, protein, health, cancer, diet, meat, red

steak a.jpgRecently, there has been a attention about meat in the diet. One side of the argument says we should eat more and the other says we should not eat any. Today's article will set the stage with some basic information about meat and our diet. Future articles will look at individual questions around this topic.

 

Can you remember playing the telephone game when you were a kid? One person would come up with a sentence and whisper it in the ear of the person next to them. That person would then whisper it in the ear of person next to them and so on. Eventually the sentence would make it to the last person who would then say the sentence out loud. Inevitably, the sentence would be quite distorted from the original. This is a common situation in nutrition and the concerns around meat consumption are a great example.

What are the concerns?

There are several issues/questions related to meat consumption:

 

- Does meat consumption lead to obesity?

- Does meat consumption cause heart disease or cancer?

- Is it safe to eat meat?

- If I'm going to eat meat, what kind of meat should it be?

- Are there ethical issues involved with eating meat?

 

It is important to consider where the advice you are receiving comes from and what the facts are in relation to that advice. There are parties interested in seeing the continued rise in the sales of beef and there are those who would like to see all animal foods removed from our diets. The story from either perspective can be extreme. The truth is likely found somewhere in the middle.

Defining Meat

Before we can examine the questions above or understand what the research on meat consumption is saying, we should understand what "meat" is. You might look at meat on a continuum.  On one end you have highly processed hot dogs and most deli meats. These can contain a high amount of preservatives, non-meat products, fillers, etc. On the other end of the spectrum, you may have various cuts of grass-fed, free-range beef. If you were to look at a list from highly processed to most natural, it might look like this:

 

- Most hot dogs and deli meats, meat in many microwavable meals

- More natural or preservative-free deli meats and other processed meats

- Commercial ground beef, steaks, roasts, etc

- Grass-fed beef, steaks, roasts, etc.

- Grass-fed, free-range beef, steaks, roasts, etc.

*This list is not meant to all inclusive but used as an example.

 

Although the list above points more toward beef, a similar list could be made for pork, poultry, even fish, although the names would be slightly different. The significance of the list above is understanding what the Standard American Diet (SAD) is composed of, which is a LOT more of the types of meat at the top of the list. When we see research on the effects of meat consumption on health, the SAD is what is often used for study. There is yet to be a study done on the long-term effects of high levels of grass-fed, free-range beef consumption. If there were studies done on this type of beef, they would likely provide data that supported a very healthy outcome from their consumption.

Where did the concerns about meat consumption come from?

The concerns about meat consumption come from a few different sources. First, since the 1950's, meat consumption has been associated with increasing risks of heart disease and cancer because it contains higher levels of saturated fat and cholesterol. This is an interesting discussion by itself, but requires too much space for this article. Suffice to say, there has been growing doubt as to whether the saturated fat and cholesterol really have as much of an effect on heart disease risk as was previously thought. The second area of concern about meat consumption comes from the way much of the meat eaten today is processed. With the preservatives, fillers, even high fructose corn syrup and trans-fat in many processed meats, it's possible these ingredients could lead people down a path toward less health and more disease. A third area of concern about meat consumption comes from the way animals today are grown to provide the meat we eat. Much of the meat we eat today comes from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), which are like factory farms. They make for a more profitable, low-cost operation, but disease is more common, the animals are not fed their natural diet and the treatment of animals can be questionable. This is a topic we'll discuss in more depth in the future. I would also encourage you to see the film Food, Inc. which is playing nation-wide in select theaters. It is a very powerful film that goes into detail on what farming is like today. Finally, the fourth area of concern about meat consumption would come from vegetarian groups. This is more of a personal choice which we'll look at in the future.

Summary

For today, the goal was to get an initial understanding of what is termed as "meat." Obviously, when meat consumption is analyzed in research using today's average diet, it is far different than the meat that was eaten even fifty years ago. In fact, Dr. Johnny Bowden, author of The 150 Healthiest Foods on Earth, in an interview, recently answered the question "What are three amazing foods we should be eating more of and why?" His answer was blueberries, salmon, and grass-fed beef. We'll look at why in an upcoming article. Next Thursday, we'll look at how meat consumption got a reputation for leading to obesity, heart disease, and cancer.

 

In health,

Tom Nikkola

 

References:

Bowden, J The 150 Healthiest Foods on Earth. 2007. Fair Winds Press, Gloucester, MA

Pollan, M The Omnivore's Dilemma. 2006. The Penguin Press, New York, New York

Food, Inc. The Movie

Fallon S, Enig M. It's the Beef. Wise Traditions, The Weston A. Price Foundation Newsletter. Spring, 2000

 


This article is not intended for the treatment or prevention of disease, nor as a substitute for medical treatment, nor as an alternative to medical advice. Use of recommendations in this and other articles is at the choice and risk of the reader.

279 Views 0 Comments Permalink Tags: nutrition, protein, health, diet, meat

fitness pills.jpgLast week we talked about the importance of a good breakfast. Plenty of protein and the right amount of carbohydrates can set you up for a more productive, higher-energy, less-hungry day. If this was new to you, hopefully you felt a difference this past week. Before moving away from breakfast, there's one more thing to add to your morning meal to make it complete - multivitamins and fish oil. No matter how well we try to eat the right foods on a daily basis, it's virtually impossible to get in optimal levels of vitamins, minerals, and omega-3 fatty acids. Active individuals, as well as those faced with above average levels of stress also tend to use more vitamins and minerals.

 

Covering the benefits of each of these would take up far too much space than is available here. Instead, we'll just take a look at how to make their daily use more a part of your lifestyle. Studies show that between 50-70% of the population say they use a multivitamin. Of course, there is a difference between having multivitamins in the cupboard, and using them on a daily basis. The benefits of these supplements come from regular, long-term use, so making them a habit will be this week's challenge.

Quality Counts

As with most other things, you do get what you pay for when it comes to nutritional supplements. In the case of multivitamins, providing a more optimal formula, which uses mostly-natural forms of vitamins, proper dosages of minerals and includes additional, beneficial herbs, costs far more than a mostly-synthetic multivitamin that just meets RDI/RDA numbers. Much of the current research showing the benefits of vitamins and minerals, such as with vitamin D, comes from the use of these vitamins above RDI levels. That doesn't mean people should get as much as they can of all of the vitamins and minerals, but it does mean that there are some vitamins and minerals where you may benefit from taking extra amounts. A high-quality multivitamin will be formulated in a way to ensure you're receiving optimal amounts of most micronutrients, while not risking overconsumption. Calcium and magnesium take up a significant amount of space, so they are not normally found in a multivitamin in high doses. With these two minerals, you'll probably need to take an additional tablet to meet your daily needs.

 

In the case of omega-3 fish oil, you can find large variety of qualities and prices as well. Like multivitamins, fish oil can come from various sources. Ideally, fish oil should be sourced from small fish, in the cold, deep waters of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and Norwegian Sea. These oils provide the highest quality, as opposed to the oil from "farmed" fish. The concentration of EPA and DHA should be over 50% of the oil, which means if the fish oil contains one gram of total fat, the total of EPA and DHA should be at least 500 mg.

 

For proper absorption, it's important to take your multis and fish oil with food. That's why we started with breakfast as the first habit last week. If you don't eat a complete breakfast, the vitamins and minerals may not be optimally absorbed. They can also leave you feeling nauseous.

Feeling a Difference

Taking your multis and fish oil does not provide an immediate feeling or response, which makes adherence more challenging. Some people may mention a difference in energy levels from taking their multis in the morning, or improved sleep from their evening multivitamins. It is certainly possible that the supplement can have such an effect, especially if someone lacks some of the nutrients in their daily diet that the supplement is providing. B-Vitamins are important for energy, some minerals are important for rest and recovery. However, it can also be attributed to a placebo effect. Some people claim they have more clarity when they being using omega-3 fish oil. There is significant amounts of research on omega-3 and brain function, so this is possible as well, although there have been major research reports done on this aspect of omega-3 benefits.

Making it a Habit

So if most people won't feel considerably different from taking a multivitamin and fish oil, how can adherence become better? For the most part, it comes through education. As you understand more and more how important the various vitamins, minerals, and some herbs are in a healthy metabolism, longevity, and daily recovery from stress and exercise, you begin to understand the importance making this a daily habit. As you understand the importance of making this a daily habit, it will become easier to remember when you should be taking your supplements.

 

It's ideal to take the multivitamins and fish oil a couple of different times during the day, especially if they some in a morning and evening formula. As mentioned above, some vitamins can support energy production, so a higher concentration of these in the morning would be more appropriate, whereas a higher concentration of the "rest and recovery" minerals should be included in the dose later in the day. In the case of omega-3 fish oil, it's not a requirement to split up the doses. However, taking four or more fish oil capsules at one time can lead to more of a fishy taste, so splitting them up with your multivitamin intake would be wise.

 

This week's challenge of making your multivitamins and fish oil a habit might already be part of your day. For others, you make an attempt, but end up forgetting a couple of times per week. Everyone seems to have their morning and evening rituals, such as when they brush their teeth, when they eat, etc. The key is to make your mulitvitamin and fish oil as much a part of your day as these other habits.

 

In health,

Tom Nikkola

 

This article is not intended for the treatment or prevention of disease, nor as a substitute for medical treatment, nor as an alternative to medical advice. Use of recommendations in this and other articles is at the choice and risk of the reader.

338 Views 2 Comments Permalink Tags: nutrition, health, diet, multivitamin, fish, oil, habits

Pumpkin Power

Posted by Tom Nikkola Oct 8, 2009

pumpkins a.jpgIt's October again and pumpkins seem to be everywhere - the grocery store, gas station, in the fields of farms alongside the road. Many people see this fruit as just something to carve and put a candle in. The truth is, pumpkin is a very nutritious, low-calorie food. Even if you don't plan to carve a pumpkin, you may still want to add some pumpkin into your diet as it provides quite a dose of nutrients.

Pumpkin Nutrition

Pumpkin is high in carotenoids. One of the carotenoids found in pumpkin is beta carotene, which has been shown to help protect against certain types of cancer and heart disease. It is also high in lutein and zeaxanthin which support eye health. Vitamin A and vitamin C are also high in pumpkin. The large amount of potassium in pumpkin may be beneficial for those with hypertension. Pumpkin is also very high in fiber, which is beneficial for reducing appetite and supporting weight management.


Another, often neglected, healthy part of the pumpkin is the seeds. Pumpkin seeds may be beneficial in supporting prostate health. In animal studies, they have been shown be very effective in reducing inflammation. The seeds are also high in magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, and protein.


The best part about pumpkin is that you can eat A LOT of it for a very small amount of calories. The nutrition information for one cup of mashed pumpkin is:

49 calories

0 grams fat

12 grams carbohydrate

3 grams fiber

2 grams sugar

2 grams protein


One ounce of pumpkin seeds contains:

125 calories

5 grams fat

15 grams carbohydrate

5 grams protein


If you do some searching online, you'll be able to find many good, low-calorie options for using pumpkin. There are many versions of low-calorie, crustless pies and pumpkin mouse. If you have a favorite, feel free to share it in the comments section below. I've shared one recipe from my wife, which is a fantastic soup.

Pumpkin and Sausage Soup

Ingredients:

1 lb sweet Italian chicken sausage, sliced

1/2 cup onion, chopped

1/4 lb. portabello mushrooms, chopped

1 clove garlic, minced

15 oz. can 100% real pumpkin (not pie pumpkin) or you could use fresh pumpkin

4 cups chicken broth

1/2 cup heavy cream

1/2 cup water

1 Tablespoon Italian seasoning

Salt and pepper to taste


Directions:

In a large pot, brown the sausage along with the onion, mushrooms and garlic. Add the pumpkin, broth and Italian seasoning. Season with salt and pepper to taste. Cover and simmer 20-30 minutes. Add the cream and water, simmer 10-15 minutes longer. Adjust seasoning. Makes 8 1-cup servings. Enjoy!


In health,

Tom Nikkola

 

References:

Adamik P. The Health Benefits of Pumpkins. Associated Content, Sept 21, 2006

World's Healthies Foods. www.whfoods.org

 

This article is not intended for the treatment or prevention of disease, noras a substitute for medical treatment, nor as an alternative to medicaladvice. Use of recommendations in this and other articles is at thechoice and risk of the reader.

234 Views 0 Comments Permalink Tags: nutrition, health, diet, recipe, cooking, pumpkin

Popeye a.jpgI'm strong to the finich

Cause I eats me spinach,

I'm Popeye the Sailor Man.

 

Although Popeye's bulging muscles probably didn't come only from eating spinach, his can of vegetables certainly could have helped. It's a lesson many of us could learn from. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) recently released a state-by-state report of fruit and vegetable consumption, and the results were far from respectable. The results showed that only 33 percent of adults meet the fruit and 27 percent of adults meet the vegetable recommendations each day. More than likely, these numbers include the consumption of fruit juices which are not as nutritious as whole fruit, so the numbers may actually be even worse. If we all know that fruit and vegetables are important, how can we ensure we consume enough each day? How can we make sure fruit and vegetables are more of a priority in our meals?

Make it a Habit

Some estimates show that we eat about 80% of the same foods from week to week, which means some of our diet is a result of long-term habits. If you don't eat vegetables with meals on a daily basis, there is a good chance you don't even consider it when it comes time to eat. One of the easiest ways to being making it a habit is to buy the small bags of pre-made salad mixes (without the dressing in them). Take a bag with you, along with your favorite "calorie-appropriate" dressing. If you forget, almost every restaurant has a variety of salads. You could even pick one up at LifeCafe on your way out of the club and save it for later in the day. My favorite at LifeCafe is the Mediterranean Salad.

Buy Fresh Vegetables Frequently

Food prices today are not cheap. If you're like most people, you're not going to want to waste food. If you make it a point to buy more vegetables each time you go to the store, it's more likely you'll eat them throughout the week. If you have access to organic vegetables at the store or at a Farmer's Market, it's probably worth the small increase in price to buy them over the regular produce.

Look for Alternatives

What if you don't have the time to eat your fruit of vegetables? Not everyone has the time to sit down and eat a full meal, vegetables included. Juice is often promoted as an alternative. Unfortunately, fruit juice is highly concentrated in sugar, and lacks much of the fiber found in normal whole-fruit. For fruit, juice would not be a good replacement for whole fruit on a regular basis.

 

Vegetable juices often work well since there is not much sugar in vegetables. It is not the same as eating fresh vegetables, but is a great addition to a healthy nutrition plan. Many drinks and mixes offer fruit and vegetable blends as well. They contain dried blends of fruit and vegetables, which provide a host of antioxidants and are a very convenient way to take in additional fruit and vegetables. In fact, our newest supplement, FastFuel Complete, contains 750 mg of a proprietary fruit and vegetable blend with each serving. It's incredible how many different vegetables can be packed into a great-tasting vanilla or chocolate shake.

Summary

There is no doubt that your body benefits from consuming plenty of fruits and vegetables. For whole foods, try to consume more vegetables than fruit because they are far lower in calories and sugar. Fruit is certainly healthy, but still contains plenty of calories. Eat them. Drink them. Just get them in. You may not turn into "Popeye" overnight, but making them part of your usual nutrition plan can certainly help you develop an "Eye-Popping" physique.

 

In health,

Tom Nikkola

255 Views 0 Comments Permalink Tags: nutrition, health, diet, fastfuel, vegetables, cdc, fruit

Girl smoothie small.jpgThe idea of using a meal replacement powder (MRP) is nothing new in the nutrition and fitness industry. They have come a long way from the high-sugar, very bad-tasting shakes of twenty years ago. The concept has always been the same, and the science tends to support their use. So how does a MRP support optimal nutrition?

Set Number of Calories

Meal Replacement Powders provide a consistent number of calories and macronutrients (protein, carbs, fat), which make their use in a calorie-controlled nutrition plan very convenient. While weight management is not only about calories in and calories out, the concept does play a role. Whatever one's goals are - weight loss, gain, or maintenance - MRPs provide an easy way to ensure the planned number of calories are consumed for a meal. A 2003 Meta-Analysis of research on the use of meal replacement powders for weight management showed a very high rate of success when compared with dieting with food alone. Making energy, or calorie consumption easier to manage is likely one of the reasons they support weight management so well.

A Better Choice

The average person can consume a significant number of calories between meals. Snacks are typically high in carbohydrates or carbohydrates and fat - not the best option for controlling weight. As people begin the cycle of high-carb meals early in the day, they set themselves up for rises in blood-sugar followed by crashes, which lead them to more high-carb snacks. Studies have consistently shown that a higher-protein diet enhances body composition, partially due to the fact that protein requires more calories for digestion, supports the maintenance of lean body mass (muscle tissue) and helps maintain more normal levels of blood-sugar.

 

Choosing to drink a great-tasting MRP instead of snacking on the usual office or break room fare can have a significant impact on body composition. Of course, snacking on a chicken breast or cottage cheese may be a good whole-food protein choice, but eating whole-food protein four to six times a day may not be appealing. Instead, eating three whole-food meals with protein in them, and drinking a couple of MRPs  sounds a lot more appetizing for many people. If you look forward to what you're supposed to eat (or drink), it will make it a lot easier to stick with the appropriate nutrition plan.

A Great Protein Source

Not everyone likes to eat large amounts of animal protein, and commercial sources of animal protein have been called into question as of late. Protein powder such as whey protein provides significant amounts of high-quality branched chain amino acids, critical to health, fitness and performance. Whey is considered to be the best protein source available. It is digested quickly and easily, and has a very high rate of absorption.

Unique Ingredients

Meal replacement powders often contain a list of additional ingredients to support health, fitness and performance, which may not be found in a normal meal. As an example, our new MRP called FastFuel Complete contains extra ingredients like a fruit and vegetable blend, glutamine, digestive enzymes, and Sunfiber. These ingredients support digestion, recovery, the immune system, and provide additional antioxidant benefits.

Cost Effective

A great-quality MRP is usually about $2.50 per serving. If you were to attempt to pack in as much quality nutrition as you can find in a MRP through a whole-food meal, it would be a challenge to keep the cost as low. If you tried to find a high-quality meal or snack at a restaurant of store with comparable nutrients, it would likely cost much  more than $2.50 per serving. It's also nice knowing it won't spoil. You can throw it in a shaker-cup or a small blender whenever you're ready to drink it. You don't have to worry about keeping it cool.

Summary

Meal replacement powders really do get the job done. In addition to a high-quality multivitamin and omega-3 fish oil, a high-quality MRP could be a staple in a proper nutrition plan. A recent study compared people following an unstructured, whole-food diet with exercise, with a group following an unstructured whole-food diet plus two MRPs per day with exercise. A third group was the control group, which did not exercise. Basically, the groups could eat what they chose, but the MRP group had to drink two Meal Replacements per day. The group that drank the two shakes each day and exercised:

- reduced their total carbohydrate, fat and calorie consumption without counting calories or following a structured plan

- improved exercise performance, recovery, and time to exhaustion

- reduced fat mass and maintained lean body mass

Optimal nutrition involves providing your body with what it needs on a very consistent basis. The use of a couple of Meal Replacements each day ensures that 14 meals per week are nutrient-dense, healthy choices. Add three high-quality whole-food meals to the plan, and you'll be giving your body what it needs 35 times per week. That sounds like a recipe for success.

 

In health,

Tom Nikkola


References:

Lockwood C, Moon J, Tobkin S, Walter A, Smith A, Dalbo V, Cramer J, Stout J. Minimal nutrition intervention with high-protein/low-carbohydrate and low-fat, nutrient dense food supplement improves body composition and exercise benefits in overweight adults: A randomized controlled trial. Nutrition & Metabolism. 2008;5:11

Heymsfield SB, van Mierlo CAJ, van der Knaap HCM, Heo M, Frier HI. Weight management using a meal replacement strategy: meta and pooling analysis from six studies. International Journal of Obesity. 2003;27:537-549

 

Thisarticle is not intended for the treatment or prevention of disease, noras a substitute for medical treatment, nor as an alternative to medicaladvice. Use of recommendations in this and other articles is at thechoice and risk of the reader.

532 Views 0 Comments Permalink Tags: weight, loss, nutrition, protein, diet, weight_loss, performance, supplement, powder, drinks

woman looking in refrigerator 1.jpgLast week's article discussed sugar consumption and its impact on health. The next day, Monday (August 24), the American Heart Association released a report recommending a reduction in sugar consumption for the US population. The idea of cutting back on sugar sounds easy for those who consume small amounts of sugar. However, for those who have been consuming larger amounts, it may be easier said than done. One way to transition from the use of large amounts of added sugars may be the use of similar foods or beverages which contain non-caloric sweeteners, also called nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS). Because of the controversy and confusion surrounding them, we'll take a look at some of the more recent studies that have been done and discuss what they have and have not shown us. We'll look at their effect on weight management, potential side effects and other details research has shown us.

In January, Richard D Mattes and Barry M Popkin did an extensive report on NNS which was published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. This report and other papers listed will provide a reference source for the topics discussed. I hope to cover the whole topic over the course of four articles as follows:

  1. Impact on Hunger
  2. Use in Weight Management
  3. Potential Concerns
  4. Summary
Types of Nonnutritive Sweeteners

The list of sugar substitutes includes saccharin, aspartame, acesulfame-potassium (ace-K), sucralose, neotame, and stevia. Other than stevia, which is quite new, a significant number of safety studies have been done on these sweeteners. A few observational reports have called their recommended use into question. To keep things simple, we'll consider them as a group for now, and look at them individually at another time.

Nonnutritive sweeteners are most commonly thought of in diet soft drinks. This is also the use that has caused the most controversy. However, NNS are also used in food and mixes to improve the palatability and/or manage the caloric content of the food. The use of NNS can be beneficial when attempting to manage caloric content in the diet and still enjoy foods with a sweet taste.

NNS and Effect on Appetite

The first question we'll look at with NNS is "Do they increase appetite?" If their use made people more hungry, it would be hard to justify using them for the purpose of reducing calories in the diet. The effect of NNS on appetite has been studied on several occasions. The majority of studies on appetite are based on the use of NNS in beverage form, without the addition of calorie-containing food. This is an important point because some people will use the results of these studies to apply to all NNS use. In reality, NNS in calorie-containing food have no effect on appetite. Also, diet drinks consumed with food have no effect on hunger.

When NNS are used in non-calorie, flavored drinks, apart from food, some results have shown an increase in appetite and others have not. It seems possible that consuming a pleasant tasting beverage would activate the digestive process and could lead to hunger. Interestingly, a study on non-calorie soup also increased appetite. Since the soup did not contain NNS, it provided some clues that any short-term stimulation of appetite without the presence of calories is a result of the palatability of what is consumed, rather than the result of the chemical structure of NNS.

Additional studies have been done on the consumption of NNS through capsules or nasogastric tubes, which both deliver the NNS to the digestive system without the individual tasting them. These studies resulted in no effect on appetite, which further shows that the NNS effect on appetite is not likely due to the chemical structure, but due to its positive effect on taste.

Nonnutritive sweeteners are also used in foods and dietary supplements to provide enhanced taste without adding additional sugar-based calories. In this case, NNS consumed in calorie-containing foods has shown no effect on appetite. Their use may be beneficial in order to satisfy taste requirements without adding additional calories or increasing dietary sugar consumption.

Summary

Nonnutritive sweeteners may affect appetite in some people, but if they do, it seems to only occur when no calories are consumed at the same time. The most common way to consume NNS without any other calories include diet soft drinks and other sugar-free drinks. NNS consumed in beverages with food, or as an ingredient in calorie-containing foods, do not seem to affect appetite. From personal experience, moderate consumption of diet soft drinks has helped people deal with cravings and hunger associated with a reduced-calorie diet, as long as they are not the main source of hydration. Also, protein shakes, which often contain NNS for flavor, can actually help people deal with the hunger while also providing proper balanced of nutrients to support fitness and body composition goals.

 

In health,

Tom Nikkola

 

Go to: Non-Calorie Sweeteners: Do they support weight loss?

Go to: Non Calorie Sweeteners: Pros and Cons

References:

Mattes RD, Popkin BM. Nonnutritive sweetener consumption in humans: effects on appetite and food intake and their putative mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:1-14

Aragon A. Artificial sweetener use: current controversies. Alan Aragon Research Review. April 2009

Lutsey P, Steffen L, Stevens J. Dietary Intake and the Development of the Metabolic Syndrome: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communitites Study. Circulation 2008;117:754-761

 

This article is not intended for the treatment or prevention of disease, nor as a substitute for medical treatment, nor as an alternative to medical advice. Use of recommendations in this and other articles is at the choice and risk of the reader.

575 Views 0 Comments Permalink Tags: weight, loss, nutrition, diet, sugar, stevia, sucralose, sweeteners, artificial, aspartame, non-calorie

Happy With Groceries.jpgIf you've been exercising for a while, or spoken with a personal trainer, it's likely you've come across the topic of periodization. While this is a technique common in designing exercising programs, it may be just what you need to make big changes in nutrition as well.

Periodization is a well-known concept for developing training programs. It is a systematic way of changing a program over time to continue making improvements. Exercises are substituted or modified, training schedules are changed, rest periods are shortened or lengthened, etc. These changes take place with a methodical schedule to ensure your physique changes according to your needs and goals. Each week is some kind of step up from the previous week. Obviously, it would do more damage than good to attempt a workout you should be ready for in month four, during your first week.

Nutrition is much the same. One of the reasons people revert back to old habits is they attempt too many changes all at once. Many people find they are more successful by attempting small changes each week and building on the previous week. In our nutrition seminar, we talk about a series of habits you can work on over time. The idea is to make each one a habit before moving onto the next one.

For example, we know that taking a high-quality multivitamin and fish oil is a necessary part of a complete nutrition program for almost everyone. This is an easy first-step as it does not require changes in your schedule or modifications to what you're eating. Making that a habit for a week or more should provide a great sense of accomplishment. If you have success with your first habit, it's more likely you'll be excited to attempt the next change. Step two may be to become more aware of your total calories for the day, or to eat a well-balanced, higher protein breakfast. Either one of these will require a little more effort and change to your lifestyle than the first step, but should still be easily manageable. As time goes on, you can attempt more challenging changes to your lifestyle, such as eliminating sodas and juices, or finding a local farm to purchase your free-range, organic eggs.

Eating mostly whole-foods from organic sources, getting enough protein in your diet, supplementing appropriately, and all the other characteristics of a nutritious lifestyle are great goals to shoot for. Just be sure to take your time in doing so. Make each aspect of good nutrition a habit. If you try too much all at once, it can be difficult to stick with it all for the long run. Take on only as much as you can "digest," and "don't bite off more than you can chew." I know that's pretty cheesy, but hopefully it will help you remember this lesson. I would also strongly encourage you to take advantage of the next nutrition seminar coming up in your club. You can ask a Personal Trainer or Nutrition Coach when the next one will be, or be sure to check the Nutrition Page for upcoming Club-in-Club Events.

 

In health,

Tom Nikkola

 

This article is not intended for the treatment or prevention of disease, nor as a substitute for medical treatment, nor as an alternative to medical advice. Use of recommendations in this and other articles is at the choice and risk of the reader.

497 Views 0 Comments Permalink Tags: healthy, nutrition, diet, habits, steps

girl drinking juice1.jpgHigh Fructose Corn Syrup has been in the news for the past several years. The public opinion of this sugar source has been powerful enough to cause food manufacturers to begin replacing HFCS in many of their foods with alternative sugars. Even though HFCS may not be a nutritious ingredient in foods, the public may get misled into thinking the alternatives to this sugar are more healthy. We'll take a brief look at some of the concerns related to HFCS and discuss why some of the "natural" and "healthy" alternatives may not be all that healthy after all.

Confusion Between HFCS and Fructose

Since 1999, many research articles have shown the potential for high levels of fructose to negatively impact health. Some of the potential effects of high levels of fructose consumption include:

- Increased levels of triglycerides

- Decreased leptin hormone levels which may increase appetite or hamper the signals to stop eating

- Decreased insulin sensitivity

- Digestive distress

- Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

- Oxidative damage leading to accelerated aging

- Increased small LDL particle size which could increase heart disease risk

- Increased uric acid levels which could block insulin's ability to regulate the use and storage of sugar

- Increased storage of visceral fat

- Increased risk of developing type-2 diabetes, obesity and metabolic syndrome

It's important to remember the issues above are related to fructose consumption in most of the research. The name "high fructose corn syrup" implies this sugar contains a high amount of fructose. In fact, the form of HFCS most commonly used in foods and drinks is called HFCS-55, which contains 55% fructose and 45% glucose. Two other forms are HFCS-42 and HFCS-90. Many diet foods use HFCS-90, which contains 90% fructose, because of its high amount of sweetness. Sucrose or table sugar, contains 50% fructose and 50% glucose. That said, the makeup of table sugar and HFCS are not very different. It's possible the perceived issues with HFCS are less related to the composition of the sugar and more related to the amount that is used. Does that mean you're safe consuming HFCS? Probably not. However, these studies cannot be directly applied to the consumption of HFCS. So then, why the concern?

High Consumption of Sugar

The concern is not over what percentage of ones diet comes from fructose. It is the total amount of fructose in the diet. Estimates today say the average American consumes about 150 pounds of total sugar each year. The consumption of HFCS rose from less than one pound in 1970 to over sixty pounds per year in 2000. The increased use of HFCS comes from increased demands for sugar-containing products and its use in other food products. 

Part of the reason for the significant increase in use of HFCS is the low cost compared to sucrose. Because of the low prices, costs to consumers for products have decreased and the sizes of products have increased. More than likely, you're parents never had a super-sized soft drink when they went out to eat as kids. Because of low prices and increased appetites, we're consuming more total sugar than ever before. When you consider the amount of fructose consumed, whether it is from HFCS, sucrose, or other sweeteners, the total fructose amount for many people may be dangerously high.

Data from 2000 showed the daily average consumption of HFCS was just under 100 grams per day and total added sugars was just under 230 grams per day. That is 400 and 920 extra calories, respectively. Since this is an average number, it means many people consume amounts far higher. Some people reading this article consume almost no added sugar on a given day. That means someone else has to consume 460 grams of added sugar, or 1840 calories in a day to keep the averages the same. Over one-third of the population is obese and two-thirds is considered overweight. It's very possible eliminating unnecessary, added sugars could have a tremendous impact on our nation's health.

With the increasing rates of childhood obesity, there is some concern that the large amounts of fruit juices and soft drinks are major contributors to the obesity epidemic. Is this a result of HFCS alone? Probably not. As mentioned, fructose sweetened foods may not curb hunger. Children rarely think about serving sizes and calories. If children use juices and soft drinks as sources of hydration, they can easily consume an extra 300-500 calories, or more each day.

The Most Important Message

It is possible the focus has been so heavy on HFCS that we have lost site of the bigger picture of total sugar consumption. Total sugar consumed may be more of an issue than whether the sugar comes from HFCS. Replacing HFCS with alternatives such as sucrose, agave nectar, cane juice, or apple/pear concentrates may just change the name on the label without affecting what it is we actually consume. You can see, based on the chart below, some of the sugars that may replace HFCS will actually be higher in fructose than HFCS, especially if higher amounts have to be used to create the same taste profiles.

 

MakeupHFCS-55Honey

Crystalline

Sucrose

Invert

Sugar

HFCS-55

Grape

Juice

Concentrate

Apple

Juice

Concentrate

Pear

Juice

Concentrate

Agave

Nectar

Fructose %554850505553657474
Glucose %455250504547352626

*Glucose percentage may include a very small amount (1-3%) from lactose, maltose, and/or galactose

*Adapted from "Changing the Conversation about HFCS," referenced below.

As consumers turn away from the use of HFCS, it is critical to stay focused on the bigger issue, which is the unnecessary consumption of added sugars in the diet. From a metabolic standpoint, using HFCS, sucrose, invert sugar, honey or fruit juice concentrates can be seen as almost interchangeable. If HFCS is replaced by these kinds of sugars in similar amounts, it is not likely those foods or drinks would be any healthier for us. Some of these sugars, such as honey, are more nutritious in their raw, unprocessed form. However, that is not how they are normally found on the store shelf or in our foods.

In looking for healthy alternatives, be sure to do your homework. One sweetener that is showing up on shelves more and more is agave nectar. According to Sally Fallon, an expert in the industry, agave nectar is processed almost exactly the same as HFCS. Also, over 60% of the calories in apple juice, which is used on its own or as a base for other fruit juices, come from fructose. In fact, about two-thirds of all HFCS is consumed through beverages. The low costs of HFCS may have opened the door for us to rely on sugar as a more significant part of our diets. Switching to other sugar sources will not likely change the habits we've instilled into our lifestyle.

 

In health,

Tom Nikkola

 

References:

University of Florida. Fructose Fix. University of Florida News. 2007 http://news.ufl.edu

Univeristy of Florida. Too much fructose could leave dieters sugar shocked. University of Florida News. 2007 http://news.ufl.edu

University of Florida. Parents: Watch what you're putting in that sippy cup, UF experts warn. University of Florida News. 2007 http://news.ufl.edu

Ross, Melanie F. Scientists find sugar may have a sour side. Univeristy of Florida News. 2005 http://news.ufl.edu

Stanhope K, Schwarz J. Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans. J. Clin. Invest. doi:10.1172/JCI37385

Anderson GH. Much ado about high-fructose corn syrup in beverages: the meat of the matter. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:1577-8

Monsivais P, Perrigue M, Drewnowski A. Sugars and satiety: does the type of sweetener make a difference? Clin. Nutr. 2007;86:116-23

White J. Misconceptions about High-Fructose Corn Syrup: Is It Uniquely Responsible for Obesity, Reactive Dicarbonyl Compounds, and Advanced Glycation Endproducts? J. Nutr. 139:1219S-1227S,2009.

Bray G, Nielsen S, Popkin B. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:537-43

Fallon S, Nagel R. Worse Than We Thought: The Lowdown on High Fructose Corn Syrup and Agave "Nectar". Wise Traditions, Spring 2009. http://www.westonprice.org/modernfood/HFCSAgave.pdf

Basciano H, Federico L, Adeli K. Fructose, insulin resistance, and metabolic dyslipidemia. Nutr. and Metab. 2005 doi:10.1186/1743-7075-2-5

Melanson K, et. al. High-fructose corn syrup, energy intake, and appetite regulation. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88(suppl):1738S-44S

White J. Straight talk about high-fructose corn syrup: what it is and what it ain't. Am J Clin Nutr2008;88(suppl): 1716-21S

White J. Changing the Conversation about HFCS: Addressing Misconceptions. Presentation to California Dietetic Association, April, 2009

 

This article is not intended for the treatment or prevention of disease, nor as a substitute for medical treatment, nor as an alternative to medical advice. Use of recommendations in this and other articles is at the choice and risk of the reader.

 

 

 

 

617 Views 2 Comments Permalink Tags: weight, nutrition, diet, high, obesity, fructose, syrup, corn

123034.JPGIf you were paying attention to nutrition headlines in the news over the past week, you undoubtedly saw the Time Magazine article discussing exercise and weight loss. Another confusing headline that found its way into many media sources was the headline "High-fat diets may make you stupid and lazy." To avoid confusion about exactly what this headline means, we'll take a look at the study and discuss whether it should affect the dietary choices you make. In the end, hopefully you will avoid going to your refrigerator and tossing all of your fat-containing foods. You'll probably realize that the headline was...not that smart.

The Study

The Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics and the Department of Experimental Psychology at the University of Oxford published a study entitled Deterioration of physical performance and cognitive function in rats with short-term high-fat feeding on August 10, 2009. Researchers wanted to find out if there would be a drop in physical performance and cognition of rats who followed a low-fat high carbohydrate diet followed by a high-fat diet for nine days. Before you take the conclusions from the study too seriously, there are some important points you should understand. If a friend brings up the headline, you'll have more facts about the actual study and can share your knowledge.

  • The study was done on rats. Rat studies are often a good first step toward seeing whether a theory may be applicable to humans, but in no way, is it good science, to use one rat study and form a conclusion applicable to humans. Oftentimes these studies do not make headlines, but when they seem to support the idea of a low-fat diet, they often do. Even if the study had been done on humans, there were several other considerations in the design that should make you pause before applying the results to your own nutrition plan.
  • The original diet the rats were on was excessively high in carbohydrates.The original diet was composed of 7.5% fat, 75% carbohydrate and 17.5% protein. The rats were fed this diet for two months after they were introduced to the lab, so their bodies would have likely become accustomed to this type of diet. It would be expected that switching them to a high fat (55% fat, 29% protein, 16% carbohydrate) diet would require a period of transition for their bodies to become adapted to the new diet. However, the study only lasted nine days. In humans, the adaptation period from a mixed diet to a low-carb or ketogenic diet often takes ten days to three weeks to adapt, much longer than the study allowed. The decreases in performance and cognition during that time could have easily been the result of the adaptation period. Studies have shown that for some people, once they are through the adaptation period their performance and cognition are better than they were on the previous diet, but they will almost always see a short-term decrease.
  • The high-fat group consumed 51% more calories than the low-fat group. Both the low-fat and high-fat groups gained weight during the study. The low-fat, sedentary group averaged an 8% gain in weight and the low-fat, exercising group gained an average of 6% body weight. The high-fat, sedentary group averaged a 10% weight gain and the exercising high-fat group averaged a 15% increase in weight. Those are important statistics the were not emphasized. The low-fat group averaged a 6-8% increase in weight, while the high-fat groups averaged 10-15% increases in weight, while eating 50% more calories! In human terms, imagine how you would perform and feel if you suddenly had to consume 50% more calories every day for a week and a half, and gained weight at twice the rate of those around you! It is possible the weight gain and/or additional calories by themselves could have been part of the problem.

Conclusion

The most accurate conclusion that can be drawn from this study is that no conclusion can be drawn. There are some deeper-level issues with the study as well, but I've just included some of the points that are easier to remember. The idea of low-fat dieting being the answer to health and wellness is fading more each year. While the answer may not be a high-fat diet either, there is plenty of evidence to support the need for natural fats in the diet. There is also a lack of evidence to support the philosophy of low-fat dieting. A great article to complement this would be Skimming the Truth, found in the latest issue of Experience Life.

It is also important to consider the meaning of a "high-fat diet." If this means the way that most Americans eat, which also includes a lot of refined carbohydrates and added fats, there's no doubt that such a diet is unhealthy. However, diets high in fat and low in carbohydrates can be beneficial for certain individuals and athletes, and certain amounts of fat are essential for everyone.

In the end, the proper mix of carbohydrates, fat and protein is as individualized as each person's metabolism. Low-er fat is sometimes necessary, as is high-er fat. For the sake of your health, don't turn away from fat in your diet. It plays a critical role to health and wellness. Just be sure to make wise choices in where you get it from. And stay away from refined carbohydrate foods, which make the consumption of fat far less healthy.

 

In health,

Tom Nikkola

 

References:

Murray A, Knight N, Cochlin L, McAleese S, Deacon R, Rawlins JN, Clarke K. Deterioration of physical performance and cognitive function in rats with short-term high-fat feeding. The FASEB Journal. fj.09-139691. 2009

Helgoe C. Skimming the Truth. Experience Life Magazine. September 2009

Cordain, Loren. The Paleo Diet. Rodale Publishing:New York, NY. 2005

McDonald, Lyle. The Ketogenic Diet. Morris Publishing: Kearney, NE

296 Views 0 Comments Permalink Tags: nutrition, research, diet, fat, high

123038.JPGDuring my time as a Personal Trainer, I met many members in FitPoints who were eagerly beginning a new fitness program. We often discussed their health and exercise history, as well as details on their eating habits. It seemed like more than half of the time, as we began discussing nutrition, they were excited to tell me that as part of their commitment to their new fitness program, they had given up coffee. While the commitment to make a change to eating habits was a noble one, the focus on dropping coffee may have been somewhat misdirected. Over the years, there has been a perception that drinking coffee has a negative impact on health. Many studies, however, have shown the contrary. Coffee drinking may be one of the habits many of us have that can actually support our health. While it's not appropriate for every individual, most healthy people can get a lot of benefit from drinking coffee during the day.

Defining a "Cup of Coffee"

The meaning of a "Cup of Coffee" has changed dramatically over the past ten years. To many people, it no longer means the drinking plain coffee, black, or with cream or sugar. In fact, if you go to Starbucks, there are actually 87,000 different combinations of "coffee" you could drink. In reviewing the health benefits of coffee, we'll explore only real coffee. Except in the case of just adding milk to your coffee, adding anything else to it is likely to significantly increase the calories, and possibly limit any health benefits you may have gotten from the coffee itself.

Health Benefits

As more research has been done, the evidence is indicating that there seems to be many more positives than negatives with coffee consumption. Many of the studies are epidemiological studies, so they cannot prove coffee causes the benefits described in the studies. They only show an association, which will lead to further research on the subjects. Recent studies have shown coffee consumption may reduce diabetes and heart disease risk. Studies suggest some non-caffeine components of coffee increase insulin sensitivity and thereby reduce the risk of diabetes. The reduction in heart disease risk is thought to come mostly from the caffeine in coffee because there is no significant protective effect from decaffeinated coffee. It is still possible, though, the flavonoids found in coffee, and also in tea, cocoa, and chocolate, could provide some cardiovascular protection.

 

In a recent study, drinking three cups of coffee for three weeks was shown to increase a group of bacteria called Bifidobacterium. The bacteria are associated with some health benefits, but more research will be required before conclusions can be drawn. An additional benefit of coffee is it contains many antioxidants. In fact, coffee is the number one source of antioxidants in the American diet, more than any other food or beverage. This also requires more study to understand whether the antioxidants are absorbed once they are ingested.

Weight Management Benefits

In considering the current state of the US population, the most important benefit of coffee may be its effect on fat metabolism and energy expenditure. Since diabetes risk and many other health complications are associated with overweight and obesity, it is possible coffee's effect on lipid metabolism also helps to reduce diabetes and heart disease risk. Caffeine is likely the only contributor in coffee to the thermogenic effect. Six cups of coffee, or about 600 mg of caffeine, can increase energy expenditure by 100 calories per day. All else being equal, that is about ten pounds of body fat over the course of a year. Even as a tolerance to caffeine is perceived over time, the thermogenic effect is not reduced. Not only does caffeine increase the number of calories burned in a day, but it also shifts the body's metabolism toward using more fat versus carbohydrate, and it may increase the desire to move around more, which would also burn additional calories. If the body is burning a higher percentage of fat, and it moves around more, it will use up more fat stores. Of course, these fat-burning benefits will not make up for the result of drinking a sugar and fat-loaded "coffee" drink. If an individual does get the benefit of burning an extra 100 calories per day, but she is also drinking a 400 calorie coffee drink, there will be little benefit from the thermogenic effect.

Peformance Benefits

High-performance athletes have long known the advantages of caffeine consumption. Many of today's sports performance products have caffeine in them. Coffee is still the most common way of taking in additional caffeine to enhance performance. Caffeine has been shown to increase focus and alertness, improve coordination, decrease perceived exertion, increase time to exhaustion, and increase utilization of fat for energy. Each of these advantages can be beneficial for various sports. Since individual responses to caffeine can vary, some will derive much benefit from its use, and others may notice no difference at all.

Risks

Common concerns about caffeine use include a negative effect on calcium levels in the body, which could reduce bone density, possible increases in blood pressure and heart rate, reduced insulin sensitivity, and possible dehydration. In regards to bone density, the most significant issues seem to occur when women consume less than the recommended amount of calcium each day. Data is not conclusive, but if sufficient calcium is taken in each day, it may offset any losses caused by the caffeine in coffee. Acute increases in blood pressure are common. For many people, the effect on blood pressure seems to subside with long-term use. As low-carb dieting became popular, the concern over caffeine affecting insulin sensitivity became more well-known. The effect is acute and is more pronounced when caffeine is consumed with carbohydrate. If it was a long-term concern, it would conflict with the research showing that coffee consumption may reduce the risk of Type II diabetes. As for the concern of dehydration, caffeine consumed through coffee contains more than enough water to offset any dehydrating effect it may have. Caffeine is more of a concern when it is consumed by itself in a pill form. Heavy caffeine consumption is not recommended during pregnancy, as animal research has shown a negative effect of caffeine during pregnancy.

Summary

To summarize, the current evidence seems to say moderate coffee consumption provides more possible health benefits than risks. Individuals metabolize caffeine differently, so it's probably best to avoid heavy use without knowing your level of tolerance. In the quest for improved health and fitness, there are many other things that would be better to eliminate from the diet before focusing on your morning coffee, unless you're ordering something more extravagant than black coffee or espresso. The more fancy it sounds, the more calories it likely contains. Skip the Grande Vanilla Frappuccino with whip (470 calories, 14 g fat, 75 g carbs, 62 g sugar, 12 g pro) or the Green Tea Frappuccino with whip (490 calories, 14 g fat, 82 g carbs, 69 g sugar, 12 g pro). Try getting back to the old-fashioned way - black, in a to-go cup or in a mug.

 

I tried to fit a lot of information into what was supposed to be a small amount of space. There are likely other questions that could be addressed, or comments that could be made. I would encourage members and team members to ask additional questions and share comments on this or any of the other Nutrition blogs.

 

In health,

Tom Nikkola

 

Resources

Antonio, Jose et. al. Essentials of Sports Nutrition and Supplementation.Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2008

WebMD. "Coffee: The new health food?" WebMD. 2009 http://men.webmd.com/features/coffee-new-health-food

Keizers GB, De Galan BE, Tack, CJ, Smits P. Caffeine can decrease insulin sensitivity in humans. Diabetes Care. 2002 Feb;25(2):364-9

Salazar-Martinez E, Willett W, Ascherio A, Manson J, Leitzmann M, Stampfer M, Hu F. Coffee Consumption and Risk for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Ann of Intern Med. 2004;140:1-8

Greenberg J, Boozer C, Geliebter A. Coffee, diabetes, and weight control. Clin Nutr 2006;84:682-93

McDonald, Lyle. Coffee, Diabetes and Weigth Control - Research Review. BodyRecomposition. February 9, 2009.

Jaquet M, Rochat I, Moulin J, Cavin C, Bibiloni R. Impact of coffee consumption on the gut microbiota: A human volunteer study. Int Jour of Food Microb. March 2009;130,2:117-21

Greenberg J, Dunbar C, Schnoll R, Kokolis R, Kokolis S, Kassotis J. Caffeinated beverage intake and the risk of heart disease mortality in the elderly: a prospective analysis. Clin Nutr. 2007;85:392-8

693 Views 3 Comments Permalink Tags: weight, loss, nutrition, health, coffee, diet, caffeine

ChickenMeal2.jpgIn the first two parts of this series, we looked at health concerns related to protein intake, and what research says about protein intake and body composition. To wrap up the series, today we'll look at recommended intakes, and some general differences among protein sources.

Recommended Protein Intake

The dietary guidelines suggest a daily intake of .8 grams per kilogram of body weight. For a sedentary individual, with no interest in optimal health or body composition, it's possible that the RDA will be sufficient. As was discussed in the section on protein intake and body composition, this still may not be ideal. For a sedentary individual that consumes protein at the lower end of the recommended intake, he or she may not benefit from the satiating effect of protein. In this case, a sedentary individual can end up overeating carbohydrates and fat, and gain excess weight.

 

For exercising individuals, the International Society of Sports Nutrition recommends protein intakes in the range of 1.4 to 2.0 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight. Though research has not shown a benefit for intakes higher than these ranges, some individuals such as bodybuilders and strength athletes consume amounts higher than 2.0 grams per kilogram with no ill effect. Some long-term studies are currently being conducted on active individuals who have been eating upwards of 4 grams kilogram body weight for many years, but it will be some time before the studies are completed. For the purpose of gaining lean body mass, evidence today does not suggest it is necessary to consume more than 2.0 grams per kilogram. However, metabolisms vary, and some individuals can benefit from higher intakes.

 

Aside from exercise recovery, it is also important for those on a reduced-calorie or a weight loss diet to consume protein on the higher end of recommended ranges. When people eat less calories than their body needs, the body not only reduces fat stores but lean body mass as well. Strength training and higher protein intakes can help prevent or reduce the amount of lean mass lost. Weight management is not about calories alone. It is common for people on reduced calorie diets to focus solely on the number of calories they eat, and not where those calories are coming from.  Most of the time, the lowest calorie foods, are low-fat, low-protein, higher-carbohydrate foods. It is possible to lose weightby simply reducing calories, but if protein needs are not met, the percentage of body fat the individual carries may not change much.

 

One last point to consider for recommended intakes is how the amount is determined. Many nutrition protocols are based on a certain percentageof calories coming from each of the three macronutrients such as 55% carbohydrates, 25% fat and 25% protein. The trouble with using only percentages is, as calories go down, the actual intake of protein goes down.

 

The following is an example using a 150 pound female. For the example, we'll use 10 calories per pound for a weight loss calorie amount, and 15 calories per pound for a weight maintenance goal*. If we continue using 2 grams per kilogram of body weight as a protein recommendation, that gives us 136 grams as a daily target.

 

Weight Loss nutrition plan at 10 calories per pound body weight*

1500 calories

25% of calories from protein = 94 grams of protein

 

Weight maintenance nutrition plan at 15 calories per pound body weight*

2250 calories

25% of calories from protein = 140grams of protein

 

That is quite a variance in protein intake! Now let's look at this example a different way, and calculate protein based on body weight:

 

Weight Loss nutrition plan at 10 calories per pound body weight*

1500 calories

2 grams of protein per kilogram body weight = 136 grams of protein (36% of total calories)

 

Weight maintenance nutrition plan at 15 calories per pound body weight*

2250 calories

2 grams of protein per kilogram body weight = 136 grams of protein (24% of total calories)

 

*Calorie amounts are very rough estimates. For accurate, personal caloric needs, be sure to do a CaloriePoint

 

In the example above, for the weight loss goals, 36% of the calories coming from protein may be considered a higher protein diet. However, because the protein recommendation was based on body weight, it is actually a reasonable amount for this individual's goals. Protein is a building block for many parts of the body.  The requirements for carbohydrate and fat can vary tremendously based on activity level and training goals, but it is not wise to reduce protein in the same way.

Protein Sources

The last big piece of the puzzle is deciding on where to get your protein from. Protein sources are sometimes divided between complete and incomplete proteins, which is a way of defining the amino acid content of protein. The terms are not perfect. Generally, plant sources are considered incomplete and animal sources complete proteins. In the case of incomplete proteins, at least a couple of different sources need to be eaten together in order to provide the body with all of its amino acid needs. Animal-based proteins are considered complete proteins as they provide all of the necessary amino acids. It is possible to mix plant sources of protein to make complete protein sources. Because of their high carbohydrate content, it's possible to overeat carbohydrates and calories when trying to achieve a sufficient protein intake on a plant-based diet. The choice to eat or avoid animal protein is a personal one.

 

Avoiding animal proteins increases the risk of nutrient deficiencies, and it can be more challenging to meet ideal protein intake, but it is still possible, if necessary, to meet protein needs with a vegetarian diet. The difference between a vegetarian diet and non-vegetarian diets deserves much more space than is available here, and will be addressed in the future. As we discussed in the first post in this series, there is not any reason to fear animal protein sources, unless they are heavily processed, or if they come from commercial farms. It is best to choose free-range, pastured, grass-fed, organic sources of animal protein.

 

In future articles, we'll look at individual protein sources, such as soy, whey, casein, egg, milk, and additional protein sources. Many of these sources deserve their own post in order to weigh out the pros, cons, and ideal use of each. Whey, egg, and milk protein seem to be the best sources from a physiological standpoint. We'll look at this on a deeper level in the future.

 

Go to: Part 1 - Protein and Health Concerns

Go to: Part 2 - Protein and Body Composition

 

In health,

Tom Nikkola

 

References:

 

Dietary Reference Intakes: Recommended Intakes for Individuals (PDF|87 KB) National Academy of Sciences. Institute of Medicine. Food and Nutrition Board.

 

Campbell B, Kreider RB, Ziegenfuss T, La Bounty P, Roberts M, Burke D, Landis J, Lopez H, Antonio J: International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Protein and Exercise. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2007, 4:8

Layman DK, Evans E, Baum JI, Erickson DJ, Boileau RA. Dietary Protein and Exercise Have Additive Effects on Body Composition during Weight Loss in Adult Women. J. Nutr. 135: 1903-1910, 2005

 

Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Rolland V, Wilson SA, Westerterp KR. Satiety related to 24 h diet-induced thermogenesis during high protein/carbohydrate vs high fat diets measured in a respiration chamber. Eur J Clin Nutr 1999;53:495–50

 

Lowery LM, Devia L. Dietary protein safety and resistance exercise: what do we really know? J of the Int Soc Spo Nut 2009, 6:3

 

Clifton PM, Keogh JB, Noakes M. Long-term effects of a high-protein weight-loss diet. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87:23-9

 

Krieger JW, Sitren HS, Daniels MJ, Langkamp-Henken B. Effects of variation in protein and carbohydrate intake on body mass and composition during energy restriction: a meta-regression. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 83:260-74

 

Layman DK, Evans EM, Erickson D, Seyler J, Weber J, Bagshaw D, Griel A, Psota T, Kris-Etherton P. A moderate-protein diet produces sustained weight loss and long-term changes in body composition and blood lipids in obese adults. J Nutr 2009 139: 514-21

 

 

 

673 Views 0 Comments 2 References Permalink Tags: weight, weight, loss, loss, food, nutrition, calories, calories, protein, protein, diet, diet, performance, macronutrients, macronutrients

Smart Grocery Shopping

Posted by Tom Nikkola Jul 8, 2009

Supermarket1.jpgThe average supermarket contains 45,000 different items. Forty-five thousand different items. With the conflicting nutrition information we see through various media, and the clever way products are packaged and labeled, a simple trip to the grocery store for foods that should provide us health and nourishment can be a very confusing, frustrating activity.

If you are clear on what you need for optimal nutrition, and you keep from being misled by fancy packaging and misleading labels, you will save time and confusion. The following are some things to get you started as you make your way to the grocery store:

 

  • Fill most of your cart with items on the outside of the store

Most grocery stores are set up with the whole, unprocessed foods on the outside of the store. Most packaged, processed items will be on the shelves on the inside of the store. Of course, not all products in this area are heavily processed, but many of them are. Be sure to check the labels.

  • Fill your cart with plenty of produce

Produce should be your first stop. If possible, look for organic. You may decide to pick up some of these items at your local Farmers Market, but many grocery stores carry some products that are locally grown as well. The more full your cart is with produce, the less room you'll have to add extra processed foods once you face them.

  • Get your protein

Your next stop will likely be the meat section. Meat section is a loose term since you'll also find your chicken, turkey, fish, bison, ostrich, pork, and other sources of protein. Look for "free-range," "grass-fed," "free of hormones," "wild," etc. If you've heard mixed messages about protein intake, be sure to keep checking the nutrition site for additional articles that will be coming out in a series on protein. If you are a vegetarian, other protein sources may need to be considered.

  • Choose your dairy and eggs wisely

The topic of dairy could be a series of articles by itself, and will be addressed in the future. A few quick points: Look for hormone-free, and organic if possible. The choice of skim, 1%, 2%, or whole milk is a topic of debate. Assuming your not consuming a lot of unnecessary sugar in the diet, having milk with some fat in it is probably wise. However, this requires more space to discuss than is available here. Look for eggs from free-range chickens, or at a minimum, those that have a higher amount of Omega-3s. Eggs are one of the best whole-food sources of protein, and a great way to start your day. Yogurt can be a source of a lot of extra sugar. Be sure to check the labels. The other common dairy product is cottage cheese, which is a great source of protein if you are not lactose intolerant.

 

At this point in your shopping trip, your cart should be about half-full, which leaves the freezer section and the rest of the inside shelves. You'll also likely have a "health food section," but keep in mind that not all foods in that section are appropriate for each individual's meal plan. Over time, we'll add more advice about other various food products on the nutrition page. I would also strongly encourage you to register for the Nutrition-Smart Shopping Tour at your local Life Time Fitness. Your Nutrition Coach or Personal Trainer will guide you through your local grocery store and help answer some of the more individual question you may have. The event will take place each quarter. Space is limited, so be sure to register soon. Happy shopping!

 

Yours in health,

Tom Nikkola

713 Views 2 Comments 0 References Permalink Tags: healthy, nutrition, diet, shopping, grocery, groceries
1 2 Previous Next